داوری مقاله

[mohamad0014]

سلام

ممکنه دوستان راهنمایی کنند که چگونه و با چه فرمتی باید برای یه مقاله کنفرانسی را review نوشت؟

[Nasim67]

سلام
محمد جان اگر منظور شما نحوه نوشتن مقالات مروری است،می توانید از تاپیکی که هم اکنون در فروم موجود است(نحوه نوشتن مقالات مروری )، استفاده کنید.اگر نه که با عرض معذرت من منظورتونو متوجه نشدم.

[mohamad0014]

مقاله ای هست که در کنفرانسی که در آینده نزدیک قراره برگذار بشه باید review بشه و در نهایت اکسپ یا ریجکت. فرمت این کامت ها باید چطوری باشه.

[Nasim67]

الان منظورتونو متوجه شدم.
برای review مقالات شما،به عنوان داور،باید به موارد زیر توجه کنید:
1.Abstract
2.Introduction
3.Conclusion
4.Discussion
5.References
6.Contribution
اینکه آیا مقاله واضح است یا خیر/مطلب به خوبی پرورش داده شده است یا خیر/Contribution کار چه بوده است و آیا تاثیری در گسترش دامنه دانش موجود داشته است یا خیر؟/نتیجه گیری بخوبی و با دقت انجام شده است یا خیر؟/اصول نگارش مقاله با الگوی مورد نظر کنفرانس یا ژورنال یکسان بوده است یا خیر و مواردی از این دست.
همچنین در حین نوشتن کامنت،توجه به نکات زیر ضروری است:

Review forms have check boxes, and there is a temptation is
rely on the check boxes with minimal comments. But your
written comments are really the important part of your
review, and you should write comments that help both the
program committee and the authors.

In particular, be sure to cover the following in your written
comments; some of this material will be in response to questions
on the review form, but regardless it should all be covered
somewhere in your review:

1. Outline the paper.

2. Highlight the contribution of the paper, both what
the authors perceive it to be and what you perceive
it to be, as well as how significant it is.

3. State your recommendation and why.

4. State ways to improve the paper, but don't ask too
much (see both the previous and next sections).

The first forces you to reread the paper, which helps in writing
your review. The second is the hard part: you need to figure out
what the authors think is their contribution. The 3rd is one
that the program committee will focus on. Of these four, the 2nd
and 3rd are the important ones.

شما میتونید در فایل پیوست و نیز در اینجا ،پیشنهادات خیلی خوبی برای نوشتن review پیدا کنید.

موفق باشید

[amirhossein.gh]

البته این برای یه ژورناله ها ! ولی خب کلیتش درسته
The Transactions welcomes papers which describe technical
innovation, papers which are visionary and promise significant
advances in the coming years, as well as papers which provide an
overview of an important development in the field of Electric
Power Systems and Education. Authoritative tutorial papers
giving a succinct account of an entire field may also be
accepted. Please follow these steps to complete the review.


Complete the Score Sheet on the web with the following
information and submit:
1. Your recommendation: Accept without changes (A), Revise and Resubmit – may resubmit after mandatory revision (R&R), or Reject – do not resubmit ®;
2. Ratings of various categories;
3. Comments to be sent to the author: General Comments,
Mandatory Changes, Suggested Changes;
4. Any comments to the Editor which will not be sent to the
author.

It is required that you prepare comments to the author to
support your ratings and recommendation, without identifying
yourself. Your recommendation should not be included in your
statement since an individual reviewer cannot be sure of the
final decision on the paper. Your comments will be forwarded
the author anonymously. So please be fair, concise,
constructive, and considerate. If you are recommending
mandatory changes, please be clear as to what must be done to
make the paper acceptable. If the author chooses to revise the
paper, you may be asked to see if he has met your expectations.
You may also include separate comments about the paper for
consideration by the Editor/EIC.

[Babak]

فایل پیوست یک مقاله معروف هست که توسط Alan Smith نوشته شده و درش نحوه داوری مقالات رو توضیح داده. اگر این مقاله رو قبلا نخوندید توصیه می‌کنم که قبل از داوری کردن مقاله حتما بخونیدش.